Browsing Tag

women s health

Abortion, Bioethics, Contraception, Culture of Death, Women's Health

Mucking the Internet

March 10, 2012

My day starts out pretty similar to most other mamas of little people. Leisurely awakened at 6 something in the am (7 this morning, making Daddy late for work – our little alarm clock is usually so reliable) by either persistent head-banging, crying or hooting/gibberish from the room next door, followed by 10 – 20 minutes of beached whaling (mine) around in the king-sized while dear husband valiantly rescues the innocent babe from his baby cage.

I’ll spare you the painful details of the ensuing breakfast/coffeeorineffectivetea/to-shower-or-not-to-shower-that-is-the-question debate, but let the record show that more often than not, ‘not to shower’ emerges victorious.

Here’s where my workday diverges from the average SAHM duties ever so slightly.

You see, I spend approximately 4-5 hours a day combing the www for treasures like this and this…and of course the occasionally tremendously uplifting tale like this.

But you have to dig through a lot of poop to find nuggets of gold.

Especially in a sickly culture dominated by relativistic, amoral/immoral detritus such as ours.

(I know, so uplifting, so hope-filled and Christ-centered. But what can I say…it gets a little discouraging some days.)

My husband often helpfully reminds me that I’m essentially doing this:

 
Although somedays it feels like this:
Point being, it’s a lot of $&*# to dig through … and it’s not a truly representative sampling of humanity or culture.
Which is tremendously helpful to me when I’m knee deep in a story like this.
God.help.us.all.
Why spend my time this way? Well, it’s a job somebody’s gotta do. And I have the distinct privilege to work as the content editor of Heroic News, the premier online resource for breaking, global news on all major life and culture issues, from euthanasia to abortion to the attack on marriage and the family.
It’s a mixed blessing to be sure, as there are some days when I just feel the crushing weight of how utterly devalued life is in this culture…
but in the end…life wins.
It does…it has.
But in the meantime, we have to keep fighting. For truth to prevail. For charity to pervade our thoughts and our actions. And for life.
Always for life.
So dear readers, will you spread the word about Heroic News? Perhaps link it to your own website or blog, and consider liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter.
You won’t be sorry. And coming Summer 2012, you’ll have yet another opportunity to engage with the issues that matter most when Heroic News the television program premiers…stay tuned for details.
Until the whole world hears.
Contraception, Culture of Death, Women's Health, Women's Rights

Contraceptive ‘medicine’ and other ironies

February 17, 2012

Now, before anyone gets too hot and bothered over the topic du jour of contraception and whether or not the government (ahem, the taxpayers, aka you and I) should pony up the cash to make it free for all, let’s take a moment to examine the science behind that wonder pill that has freed women from the tyranny of childbearing and the slavery of motherhood…and ask ourselves frankly, “has it all been worth it?”

I’ve seen more passion on Facebook in the past 3 weeks over bedroom matters than can be contained in the entire Twilight series…and then some.

It would seem that the argument, rather than being framed as a matter of religious freedom, (Should the Catholic Church be forced to violate her own beliefs and recount her stance on a major moral issue at the behest of a civil government?) has become something more of an entitlement issue (Do American women have the right to demand, from their fellow citizens, a subsidized supply of contraceptive drugs or devices in order to manage their sex lives?)

The real issue – freedom of religion – is being lost in a hormonal scuffle of epic proportion, as everyone from the major news networks’ talking heads to the ladies in my yoga class argue over whose bill the Pill is to foot.

And to that I must simply ask…really? Really?

Call me insensitive to the sufferings of the First World, but it would seem that if we are going to start demanding that the government (read: the taxpayer) fund free medical care for the masses, we should perhaps start with a nobler goal. Perhaps chemo? Or at least insulin?

For me personally, as a woman of normal health and childbearing age, the most difficult and frustrating aspect of this entire debate boils down to this simple truth: if you’re able to get pregnant as a result of having sex, something is RIGHT with your body, not wrong.

I have many, many friends who would love to have a biological child of their own, but who, for whatever reason, are physically incapable of conceiving or sustaining new life. That is, by definition, an example of a medical condition: something ain’t working like it’s s’posed to.

So to hear the plaintive cries on MSNBC and the like clamoring for ‘basic medical care’ and ‘women’s rights’ is, quite frankly, a little insulting. There is actually nothing wrong with my body; it’s functioning in tip top condition, thankyouverymuch…and by the way, my fertility happens to be an intrinsic part of who and what I am as a woman.

One of the greatest fallacies of modern feminism is the idea that women, in order to be equal to men in all respects, need to (wait for it) … become like them.

Feminism as a movement has spent the majority of its energies convincing women of their basic inferiority to men. And contraception has been the most effective and powerful weapon in the arsenal.

We were told, with the advent of the birth control pill, that we might at last grasp and achieve ‘equality’ with men. Put another way, once we could no longer ‘fall pregnant,’ we might have access to the same opportunities which our feminine bodies had, for thousands upon thousands of years, denied us. At long last, a level playing field…except, it hasn’t proven to be the smoothest turf.

For most forms of contraception, and certainly the most popular ones, the entire burden AND risk of use falls upon the woman. And should the mighty Pill fail…the burden of aborting the unwanted child is also hers to shoulder.

Those who call for government-subsidized contraceptives are no more freeing women from this burden than is the misguided parent feeding sweets to an overweight child  soothing the feelings of exclusion and loneliness after a day of playground torment. Contraceptives are not the solution: they are themselves the problem.

As a culture, we’ve been led to believe that in order to be ‘free,’ we as women need to be
1. available for sex at any given moment
2. protected from the ‘consequences’ of sexual activity so as not to be a burden to our partners and
3. repaired and remade in the likeness of the male of our species, as we are by nature ‘broken’ and in need of ‘fixing’ because we are capable of getting pregnant.

Are these truly messages of empowerment? Messages of equality and dignity? Messages we hope to instill in our young daughters as they mature into adult women?

But what about the woman who wants to be on the Pill? Who cares little for her increased risk of cancers or heart conditions long term, because she lives life in the here and now, and 50 years old is a long, long way from here?

What about the woman who enjoys a lifestyle free from the burdens of parenthood and the specter of pregnancy, either before or after marriage? What about the woman who has become so accustomed to suppressing her own fertility that to think of allowing her body to function according to design is tantamount to contemplating suicide?

Well, to her I would say one thing: you, my dear, are missing out on real freedom. It’s not always easy, and it’s certainly not always glamorous, but there is an unimaginable joy that comes in being true to oneself and living in accord with one’s nature. I was made a woman, and I won’t let anyone – even myself – try to make me into something else.

P.s. If you’re still not convinced, at least don’t make me pay for it.

Contraception, Culture of Death, Women's Health, Women's Rights

Pill pushers

January 21, 2012

Just in case anyone was worried about anything serious this election cycle, like, oh, I don’t know, the ass-dragging economy, a nuclear Iran, soul-crushing gas and grocery prices at home and general tomfoolery abroad… The big O has once again got our backs.

Don’t worry, you might be missing your mortgage payments and your children might be learning next to nothing/undergoing social engineering and reprogramming at your local publicly-funded school, but Kathleen Sebelius and her team at HHS, under the Obama administration, have made sure that no greedy, woman-hating, fundamentalist religious types will deny anyone their daily dose of synthetic hormones.

Oh, and in case you were worried, they’ll also have to pay for it.

Screw you, religious freedom.

Ps. kindly disregard that mountains of medical data decrying the myriad dangers of hormonal contraception, both to the human body and to the environment, and open wide.

Pps. If pollution and cancer don’t get you going, perhaps skyrocketing societal ills ring your bell

Abortion, Women's Health, Women's Rights

Weekenders

September 17, 2011

Coffee: check

Baby delightfully taken by his Daddy’s unaccustomed presence during the morning hours: check

Uninterrupted time to sip coffee and peruse the news: check

Life is good.  Hope your weekend treats you accordingly.

Food for thought:

To enrage: just say ‘no’ to spray tanning.  Especially if you can’t spell the word ‘no’ yet…

To illuminate: the reality of an ‘open‘ liberal mind

To encourage: because we can all use a little good news now and then

Abortion, Women's Health

The Cost of Convenience

June 4, 2010

SCPI Study on Aborted Fetal DNA in Vaccines Presented at International Meeting for Autism Research
 
(Seattle, Washington)  Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute’s (SCPI) founder and lead scientist, Dr Theresa Deisher, presented their ongoing study into the possible link between aborted fetal DNA in several childhood immunizations with Autism and Austim Spectrum Disorder (ASD) at the International Meeting for Autism Research in Philadelphia, PA May 20-22, 2010.

 
The study which was met with both shock and gratitude for her work, focused on “improper integration of the residual DNA as a possible contributor to autism, particularly in genetically susceptible infants.”
“It is known from gene therapy studies that injected naked DNA can be transported to the brain (Wang et al. 2001); that improperly integrated therapeutic DNA has caused cancer in young children (Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. 2008); and that shorter DNA fragments have a higher probability of entering the nucleus [of the cells] (Lechardeur et al. 2002)”, noted Dr Theresa whose company recently received a $500,000 grant from the Murdock foundation for their research.

Dr Deisher, along with Physicist Marissa LaMadrid, PhD are investigating whether improper insertion of DNA into the vaccine recipient cells can cause autism.  Four major areas of the research involve:
 

(1) measuring the amount and length distribution of residual human DNA in vaccines;
(2) predicting sites of DNA insertion via homologous recombination (HR) and measure insertion rates;
(3) modeling how brain cell function might be affected, either via loss of the ability to make proper connections or via selective growth of cells with improperly integrated DNA at the expense of healthy cells;
(4) conducting epidemiology studies comparing autism rates in children injected with vaccines containing human DNA residuals. 

The results reported thus far were startling, to say the least.
 
“Changepoint analysis of autism disorder demonstrates a temporal correlation with events associated with human DNA residuals in vaccines. The levels of residual DNA are well over FDA-recommended limits”, stated Dr Deisher.  “Meruvax-II contains >140ng/vial ssDNA and >30ng/vial dsDNA, with average lengths of 215bp. Havrix contains >270ng/vial ssDNA and >30ng/vial dsDNA. The FDA-recommended amounts are 10ng/dose.” 

 
While research has been conducted in the past on a possible link between thimerosal and autism, no one has ever looked at the contaminating DNA, something requested for years by Children of God for Life, a pro-life watchdog focused on the use of aborted fetal material in vaccines, medicines and other consumer products.

 
“Until the advent of AVM Biotechnology and their non-profit arm SCPI we had little hope that anyone would invest the time and money to do this study”, stated Children of God for Life’s founder, Debi Vinnedge. 
“Dr Deisher’s work is a blessing to hundreds of thousands of families, if not millions worldwide.  She is a direct answer to our prayers for a biotech company focused solely on moral research and ethically produced vaccines and therapeutics.”

 
SCPI’s work on ethical alternatives to aborted fetal vaccines was recently highlighted in the Puget Sound Business Journal. For more information, including the Washington news story and scientific data from their study see www.cogforlife.org/scpiautismstudypress.htm

Abortion, Culture of Death, Women's Health

Post Abortion Syndrome

May 5, 2010

In the flesh.  Is this anyone’s idea of a normal, healthy response?  No, but for someone who has spoken publicly about her own half dozen abortions, it’s to be expected.

Pray for this poor woman, and for the millions like her who have chosen to end the lives of their own children, and who live daily with the pain and guilt.

Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us.

Contraception, Women's Health

We’ve Got a Pill for That

April 28, 2010
I was flipping through Time magazine last night during a lull in dinner preparation, and let me tell you, if you haven’t picked up the recent edition, it’s really quite something.  The cover is dominated by one word, much as my blog is: The Pill. So small.  So powerful. So controversial.
Indeed.
Except the article, in all fairness, wasn’t particularly balanced.  There were a few bland suppositions positing the theory that maybe this miracle drug isn’t really “everything we’ve made it out to be,” but for the most part, it was clear that the author – along with the culture at large – had long ago arrived at the forgone conclusion that the Pill is, unquestionably, one of the greatest inventions in human history. 
But is it really? 
The author cited a famous and oft-quoted 40 year study which followed selected women for 4 decades of contraceptive use, and whose statistics are regularly touted as proof positive that the pill is perfectly safe, and that any risks associated are perfectly acceptable.  But there is a critical, fatal flaw in the applicability of the research in question; it doesn’t take into account the drug’s effect on younger women.
The drug companies are aware of this, of course.  But they’re also aware of their largest client base, and loath to put off potential customers with frightening and, in their minds, irrelevant information, so it’s buried deep within the text of the manufacturer’s insert included in every box. 
To quote directly from OrthoTricyclen’s manufacturer’s information: “prolonged use of the Pill, particularly if taken for 5 consecutive years prior to a woman’s first pregnancy, may increase your risk of being diagnosed with certain types of cancer.”  (Emphasis mine)
As it turns out, according to a study recently released by the Mayo Clinic, titled “Oral Contraceptive use as a Risk Factor for Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis” and authored by Dr. Chris Kahlenborn:

“There is a measurable and statistically significant” connection between the pill and pre-menopausal breast cancer, re-enforcing the recent classification of oral contraceptives

as Type 1 carcinogens.”

That ruling from the International Agency for Cancer Research was supported by the report published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings last October.
However, the study that found that the risk association was 44 percent over baseline among women who had been pregnant who took oral contraceptives prior to their first pregnancy has been, to a large degree, ignored by many media organizations.
Hmmm, wonder why that could be?  Aside from the obvious answers concerning profit margins and quarterly sales goals, one must at least acknowledge the fact that we want this, as a society and as a gender.
We want to control our bodies, our fertility, our lives… and it’s evident by the way our culture lives, extolling progress and performance at any cost.
But there are consequences, particularly in this instance, for the convenience we seek.  Serious consequences for our health, for the health of the environment, and for the health of society.
Because if fertility is a commodity, than we ourselves become machinated, to a certain extent.  We expect great things from our bodies, and yet when they fail us in some way, we are often unable to correct the malfunction, to undo the damage we’ve done.  Case in point: the ungodly rates of breast and cervical cancer we’ve seen in the past 40 years. 
More on this later in the week, but I’ll leave you with some points to ponder:
1. If there were a drug on the market directly correlated to rising rates of prostate cancer in men, would it be one of the top selling pharmaceuticals?
2. Why has so little research been publicized about the risks of contraceptive use in younger women, when girls between the ages of 15-22 are the most likely to be set on a regimen of oral contraceptive usage of any other age group? 
3.  Why aren’t women angry – or even aware – that this is happening?
Think about it…
Contraception, Women's Health, Women's Rights

Breast Cancer and the Pill: Do your Homework

October 29, 2009

I’ve included some links for further research on the bc/Pill connection. Ladies: read these studies and share their results with women whom you love. Refuse to be complicit in the destruction of a generation, and for God’s sake ask QUESTIONS in your doctor’s office.

http://www.preventcancer.com/patients/med_avoid/pill.htm

http://www.fhcrc.org/about/pubs/center_news/online/2009/05/Oral_contraceptives_and_breast_cancer.html

http://www.pregnantpause.org/safe/pillcanc.htm

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_Study_Birth_Control_Pills_Increase_Breast_Cancer_Risk.asp

http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2007may12_m275512.html

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/354/3/270?ck=nck

http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/oral-contraceptives

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8656904?dopt=Abstract


http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/search?author1=Lesley+Andrews&sortspec=date&submit=Submit

Contraception, Women's Health, Women's Rights

Don’t Think, Wear Pink!

October 15, 2009

I’ve been visually assaulted this month by proliferation of pink popping up… everywhere. The grocery store, the gym, my favorite coffee shop… I swear, if I get a pink-foil wrapped burrito at Chipotle, my head is going to explode.

Now pink is my very favorite color, it’s true. So why the rage? Why did the mere sight of that blushing, bubbly white-zinfandel colored wrist band on the NFL ref during last week’s Broncos game cause my blood pressure to spike?

Well, for the same reason that other women are experiencing elevated levels of blood pressure. And increased risk of strokes and heart disease. And skyrocketing risk rates for breast cancer:

The Pill.

The very same Pill that so many of these merchants tout as the panacea to the problems of the modern world, particularly to those faced by members of the fairer sex. The Pill, our culture proclaims from every magazine spread, television broadcast and billboard, is the answer to our over-populated, under-sexed and insufficiently satiated appetite for more.

But it’s delivered a whole lot more than we could have expected. Which brings me back to the infuriating “think pink” campaign which has somehow replaced our collective conscience for the time being, (giving the tiresome ‘go green’ mantra a break) and opened up a marketing opportunity for everyone from Safeway to Starbucks to the National Football League to show how much they care.

Except, they don’t.

At least, not enough to stop marketing or manufacturing that very same substance which is largely to blame for the skyrocketing increase in breast cancer rates over the past several decades.

Breast cancer is a terrible scourge, a vicious disease. It is heartless in its selection of victims, aggressive in its course, and cruelly demanding of its victims.

But what is far more terrible and in fact much more insidious is the idea of a collaboration of industries whose monetary interests far outweigh their humanitarian concerns.

But when you’ve got companies like Subaru and Wells Fargo funding Planned Parenthood, when you’ve got Ortho and Depo and Yaz and the like being pushed over the counter at Kroger’s to teens and middle aged mommies alike… you start to wonder. How much do these companies actually care about those customers of theirs – girls and women like you and me?

Sure, there are races for the cure, posters saluting fallen heroines who lost their battles, pink sleeves for coffee cups to show that one stands “against” breast cancer.

Because doing something, anything, in the face of overwhelming evil feels better than doing nothing at all. But the funny thing is, after all those dollars are collected at the checkout counter, after all the fundraisers and campaigns for a cure are safely in November’s rearview mirror… will those same companies and indiviudals who proclaim their concern so conspicuously still be speaking out? Will they continue to let their wallets talk for them, reconsidering purchases which might benefit the manufacturers of the Pill in an effort to “fight the good fight?”

Or will this be sufficient? Is it enough to wear a little pink for 30 days? Is no further action required to curtail the epidemic that is stalking our generation? Are we not, in fact, compelled by justice to inform women honestly about the risks associated with consumable, injectible and insertable hormonal contraceptives?

Such an inconvenient truth, this link between cancer and the Pill. It couldn’t possibly be true, could it? No, no… it’s little more than a “right wing scare tactic” or a “dogmatic religious falsehood,” a pro-life “myth”… that’s what the media continually reassures us in soothing tones.

“Don’t worry, nobody’s going to take your contraception away. You don’t have to fret; there are no consequences, and nobody is going to get hurt. Here, put on this pink hat. Affix this bumper sticker to your vehicle. Shhhh, now, doesn’t that feel better?”

I’d argue, no.

So rethink pink, my friends. And ask yourselves who the real losers are when lies become so oft- repeated they become the truth.